Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SMS abbreviations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge, then redirect (you can't really merge and redirect at the same time). —Kurykh 04:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of SMS abbreviations[edit]

Deleted as an expired prod - the reason given was Unsourced and hopelessly unencyclopedic. The article has been undeleted as a contested prod at DRV but I tend to agree with the nominator of the prod. This article lacks sources, has no clear definaition of what can be included and is effectively 100% original research. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & redirect - into List of Internet slang phrases which is essentially the same list but with citations.—Elipongo (Talk contribs) 23:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect as above. Eusebeus 10:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 23:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & redirect. Deleting before creating a redirect eliminates a page's revision history, and therefore violates the GDFL. However, what sourced/sourceable material there is in this article seems like it could be merged with List of Internet slang phrases, per Elipongo. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 00:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.